Ca. The doctor testifies that Eduardo told him that he had been beaten and described a man who looks a lot like Peter. Code 1312, 1315, 1316], Family History Reputation [Cal. Each of the rules is subject to different conditions regarding declarant availability and sometimes other conditions, as well. The first covers hearsay statements that: The second covers non-medical hearsay statements, if all of the following are true: Certain written records are admissible evidence if all of the following are true: Example: Miguel is a doctor. (3) The statement was made at or near the time of the infliction or threat of physical injury. Testimony recounting the out of court statements of the Director of the agency would qualify as a party admission because the Director was an agent of the employer. Co. v. Tarmac Roofing Systems, Inc., 63 F.3d 1267 (3d Cir. California Evidence Code section 1250 provides that, "A statement of the declarant's then existing state of mind, emotion, or physical sensation (including a statement of intent, plan, motive, design, mental feeling, pain, or bodily health)" is admissible when the evidence is offered to prove the declarant's state of mind, emotion or physical {/footnote} Such statements are not admissible to prove the truth of the matter asserted. NRS 51.105 Then existing mental, emotional or physical condition. Evidence Code 1235 Inconsistent statements [hearsay exception], endnote 6, above. tions which are normally allowed in evidence under an exception to the hearsay rule. If the statement is found to be admissible pursuant to this section, it shall be admitted out of the presence of the jury and solely for the purpose of determining the admissibility of the confession of the defendant.)Evidence Code 1253 Statements for purposes of medical diagnosis or treatment; contents of statement; child abuse or neglect; age limitations. Code 1290], Ancient Writings [Cal. Two that arise with some frequency in criminal cases are present sense impressions and excited utterances. Copyright 2023 Shouse Law Group, A.P.C. A pretrial judge ruled that the note was admissible under the "state of mind" exception to the rule against hearsay to prove the truth of the facts asserted under Pa.R.E. Similarly, Evidence Code 1230 EC provides a hearsay exception for declarations against interestthat is, out-of-court statements that are so contrary to the best interest of the speaker that no rational person would make them unless they were true. Current through the 2022 Legislative Session. Evidence Code 1228 Admissibility of certain out-of-court statements of minors under the age of 12; establishing elements of certain sexually oriented crimes; notice to defendant [exception to the hearsay rule], endnote 14, above. Prof. Miguel A. M ndez, Hearsay and Its Exceptions - 1 - C OMPARISON OF E VIDENCE C ODE WITH F EDERAL R ULES: P ART I. H EARSAY AND ITS E XCEPTIONS by Professor Miguel A. Mndez * A. (Evidence of a persons general reputation with reference to his character or a trait of his character at a relevant time in the community in which he then resided or in a group with which he then habitually associated is not made inadmissible by the hearsay rule.), Evidence Code 1350 Unavailable declarant; hearsay rule. Marias testimony about the bystanders statement is hearsaybut such evidence is admissible anyway under the spontaneous statements exception. (2) There is no evidence that the unavailability of the declarant was caused by, aided by, solicited by, or procured on behalf of, the party who is offering the statement. Code 1230); or prior inconsistent statements (Evid. Other exceptions include: A statement made for medical diagnosis or treatment Recorded recollections Evidence Code 770 Evidence of inconsistent statement of witness; exclusion; exceptions. (2) Whether the declarant has a bias or motive for fabricating the statement, and the extent of any bias or motive. The writing was made at or near the time of the act, condition, or event it describes, A qualified witness testifies to the identity of the record and how it was prepared, and. Proc., Section 527.6 (a) (1). (Evidence of a statement is not made inadmissible by the hearsay rule when offered against the declarant in an action to which he is a party in either his individual or representative capacity, regardless of whether the statement was made in his individual or representative capacity.), Evid Code 1230 Declarations against interest. [Cal. (Except as otherwise provided by statute, this code applies in every action before the Supreme Court or a court of appeal or superior court, including proceedings in such actions conducted by a referee, court commissioner, or similar officer, but does not apply in grand jury proceedings.), Evidence Code 225 Statement [for purposes of hearsay rule]. But it is admissible as a prior inconsistent statementas long as Ian is allowed to take the stand again to explain the inconsistency. Hearsay is generally inadmissible in legal proceedings, as hearsay statements are considered to be too unreliable to prove the truth of the matter stated.The rules of evidence in California are governed by statute, condensed within the Evidence Code.. Most basically, "hearsay" is an out of court statement offered to prove the truth of matter asserted. Code 1235], Prior Consistent Statement Evidence of a statement previously made by a witness is not made inadmissible by the hearsay rule if the statement is consistent with his testimony at the hearing and is offered in compliance with Section 791. Business Records Evidence of a writing made as a record of an act, condition, or event is not made inadmissible by the hearsay rule when offered to prove the act, condition, or event if: Absence of Business Records Evidence of the absence from the records of a business of a record of an asserted act, condition, or event is not made inadmissible by the hearsay rule when offered to prove the nonoccurrence of the act or event, or the nonexistence of the condition, if: Official Records Evidence of a writing made as a record of an act, condition, or event is not made inadmissible by the hearsay rule when offered in any civil or criminal proceeding to prove the act, condition, or event if all of the following applies: (a)The writing was made by and within the scope of duty of a public employee. Code 1227], Declarations Against Interest Evidence of a statement by a declarant having sufficient knowledge of the subject is not made inadmissible by the hearsay rule if the declarant is unavailable as a witness and the statement, when made, was so far contrary to the declarants pecuniary or proprietary interest, or so far subjected him to the risk of civil or criminal liability, or so far tended to render invalid a claim by him against another, or created such a risk of making him an object of hatred, ridicule, or social disgrace in the community, that a reasonable man in his position would not have made the statement unless he believed it to be true. Thus, Shelleys question about the gun is admissible evidence under Evidence Code 1200 EC.27. California rule of evidence in criminal cases. (Ibid.) Shouse Law Group has wonderful customer service. State of mind of the speaker or listener, impeachment, verbal objects, effect on listener, . ADMISSIBILITY OF HEARSAY: docx: 8.02. Evidence Code 1311 Statement concerning family history of another [exception to the hearsay rule], endnote 17, above. Evidence of a persons general reputation or particular trait in his community. Code 1250] (a) Subject to Section 1252, evidence of a statement of the declarant's then existing state of mind, emotion, or physical sensation (including a statement of intent, plan, motive, design, mental feeling, pain, or bodily health) is not made inadmissible by the hearsay rule when: Technically, Tanyas testimony is hearsayit is a statement made by Raymond when he was not testifying at a trial, and it is offered to prove the truth of its content (that Raymond committed the robbery). 2d 881, 893 [13 Cal. Other Exceptions to Rule Against Hearsay . Sacramento, CA 95834, Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Disclaimer Attribution. full foundation for a hearsay exception. (a)Evidence of former testimony is not made inadmissible by the hearsay rule if: (1)The declarant is unavailable as a witness; (2)The former testimony is offered in a civil action; and. California law provides for the admissibility of out-of-court statements when "[t]he evidence is offered to prove the declarant's state of mind, emotion, or physical sensation at that time or at any other time when it is itself an issue . (Subject to Section 1252, evidence of a statement of the declarants state of mind, emotion, or physical sensation (including a statement of intent, plan, motive, design, mental feeling, pain, or bodily health) at a time prior to the statement is not made inadmissible by the hearsay rule if: (a) The declarant is unavailable as a witness; and (b) The evidence is offered to prove such prior state of mind, emotion, or physical sensation when it is itself an issue in the action and the evidence is not offered to prove any fact other than such state of mind, emotion, or physical sensation.)See also, Evidence Code 1228 Admissibility of certain out-of-court statements of minors under the age of 12; establishing elements of certain sexually oriented crimes; notice to defendant. Expect hearsay evidence to be admitted into evidence if no one objects. (4)Is offered after the writing is authenticated as an accurate record of the statement. See same.See also Evidence Code 300 Applicability of code [including the hearsay rule]. #379 (b)This section does not make admissible evidence of a statement of memory or belief to prove the fact remembered or believed. 2) Witness must confirm in court that she made prior identification and that it truly reflected her opinion at the time. ((a) Except as provided in this section and in Sections 1102, 1103, 1108, and 1109, evidence of a persons character or a trait of his or her character (whether in the form of an opinion, evidence of reputation, or evidence of specific instances of his or her conduct) is inadmissible when offered to prove his or her conduct on a specified occasion.). Evid. In simple terms, hearsay is when the witness recounts what somebody else said, when offered to prove that what the third party said is, in fact, true. Evid. ((a) In a criminal proceeding charging a serious felony, evidence of a statement made by a declarant is not made inadmissible by the hearsay rule if the declarant is unavailable as a witness, and all of the following are true: (1) There is clear and convincing evidence that the declarants unavailability was knowingly caused by, aided by, or solicited by the party against whom the statement is offered for the purpose of preventing the arrest or prosecution of the party and is the result of the death by homicide or the kidnapping of the declarant. 802. (Evidence of a writing made as a record of an act, condition, or event is not made inadmissible by the hearsay rule when offered to prove the act, condition, or event if: (a) The writing was made in the regular course of a business; (b) The writing was made at or near the time of the act, condition, or event; (c) The custodian or other qualified witness testifies to its identity and the mode of its preparation; and (d) The sources of information and method and time of preparation were such as to indicate its trustworthiness.)Evidence Code 1280 Record by a public employee. People v. Munoz, Ill.App.3d 455 (1. st. Dist. "Federal Rules of Ev. Spontaneous or contemporaneous statements, 2.6. Nonverbal conduct that is intended as a substitute for an oral or written statement (for example, nodding, shaking ones head, or shrugging). Here's what you need to know about those exceptions. Riverside criminal defense lawyer Michael Scafiddi uses his former experience as an Ontario police officer to represent clients in San Bernardino, Riverside, Banning, Fontana, Joshua Tree, Barstow and Victorville. Evid. But it is admissible under the exception to the hearsay rule for admissions by a party. Co-Conspirators Admissions Evidence of a statement offered against a party is not made inadmissible by the hearsay rule if: Declarants Liability When the liability obligation, or duty of a party to a civil action is based in whole or in part upon the liability, obligation, or duty of the declarant, or when the claim or right asserted by a party to a civil action is barred or diminished by a breach of duty by the declarant, evidence of a statement made by the declarant is as admissible against the party as it would be if offered against the declarant in an action involving that liability, obligation, duty, or breach of duty. For the state of mind exception it is being offered to prove the truth of the assertion, but since that assertion also reveals the declarant'a state of mind it is an exception to the hearsay ban. A statement describing or explaining an event or condition, made while or immediately after the declarant perceived it. Code Civ. Former testimony that was given in an earlier court or official proceeding, when the witness is now unavailable to testify; Certain statements about family history, community history, or a persons reputation in the community; Certain statements in which the speaker describes or explains a physical injury (or the threat of a physical injury) that was inflicted on him/her; Certain videotaped statements by an elderly or dependent adult in, Is not made by a witness testifying at the trial or hearing, and. The state-of-mind exception rests in part on the notion that there is no greater authority on a person's thoughts and feelings than the person who experienced them. ((a) In a criminal prosecution where the victim is a minor, a statement made by the victim when under the age of 12 describing any act of child abuse or neglect performed with or on the child by another, or describing any attempted act of child abuse or neglect with or on the child by another, is not made inadmissible by the hearsay rule if all of the following apply: (1) The statement is not otherwise admissible by statute or court rule. ]" (Id. 2. 2.1. The statement was made by the alleged abuse victim when s/he was under the age of 12. Alternatively, the evidence can be admitted through an appropriate witness and the expert may assume its truth in a properly worded hypothetical question in the . Shanes criminal defense lawyer objects, and the judge orders the jury to disregard what Terry said. (3) The entire statement has been memorialized in a videotape recording made by a law enforcement official, prior to the death or disabling of the declarant. (Evidence of reputation in a community is not made inadmissible by the hearsay rule if the reputation concerns an event of general history of the community or of the state or nation of which the community is a part and the event was of importance to the community.)Evidence Code 1324 Reputation concerning character. Definitions That Apply to This Article. Thomas, 167 Or.App. Hearsay Exception: Then Existing Mental, Emotional, or Physical Condition A statement of the declarant's then-existing state of mind (such as motive, intent, or plan) or emotional sensory, or physical condition (such as mental feeling, pain, or bodily health). Evid. If the statement is offered during trial, the courts determination shall be made out of the presence of the jury. Prove the speakers state of mind or physical sensation as s/he described it, or. ((a) Subject to Section 1252, evidence of a statement of the declarants then existing state of mind, emotion, or physical sensation (including a statement of intent, plan, motive, design, mental feeling, pain, or bodily health) is not made inadmissible by the hearsay rule when: (1) The evidence is offered to prove the declarants state of mind, emotion, or physical sensation at that time or at any other time when it is itself an issue in the action; or (2) The evidence is offered to prove or explain acts or conduct of the declarant. The State of Mind Exception to the Hearsay Rule. Code . Code 1224], Statement of Right or Title When a right, title, or interest in any property or claim asserted by a party to a civil action requires a determination that a right, title, or interest exists or existed in the declarant, evidence of a statement made by the declarant during the time the party now claims the declarant was the holder of the right, title, or interest is as admissible against the party as it would be if offered against the declarant in an action involving that right, title, or interest. Before Peters trial begins, Eduardo is deported to Guatemala. Evid. (Evidence of a statement is not made inadmissible by the hearsay rule if the statement: (a) Is offered to explain, qualify, or make understandable conduct of the declarant; and (b) Was made while the declarant was engaged in such conduct.), Evidence Code 1242 Dying declaration. (Evidence of a statement made by a witness is not made inadmissible by the hearsay rule if the statement is inconsistent with his testimony at the hearing and is offered in compliance with Section 770.)See also Evidence Code 770 Evidence of inconsistent statement of witness; exclusion; exceptions. The State of Mind exception applies when the statement is introduced to show the mental state of the person (for instance, that they were concerned about something). (2)The evidence is offered to prove or explain acts or conduct of the declarant. Maria didnt see the defendants Buick hit the pedestrian. Code 1283], Former Testimony [Cal. CEC - Exception to hearsay rule: 2 requirements: 1) Witness must have made identification while memory of event was fresh; and. Statements concerning someone elses family history, if they were made by a speaker who was a relative of that person or else otherwise was close enough to his/her family to have had accurate information. (4) Absent from the hearing and the court is unable to compel his or her attendance by its process. Evid. Code 1330], Boundary Statement [Cal. (c)The sources of information and method and time of preparation were such as to indicate its trustworthiness. "If the judge finds by clear and convincing evidence that unlawful harassment exists, an order shall issue . Thus, in Ederly v. Code 1222]. (Evidence of a statement previously made by a witness is not made inadmissible by the hearsay rule if the statement is consistent with his testimony at the hearing and is offered in compliance with Section 791.)See also Evidence Code 791 Prior consistent statement of witness. Evidence Code 1200(a) including but not limited to business records, party admissions, prior consistent or inconsistent statements, dying declarations, non-party declarations against interest, statements regarding state of mind or physical condition, and past recollection . (3)The issue is such that the party to the action or proceeding in which the former testimony was given had the right and opportunity to cross-examine the declarant with an interest and motive similar to that which the party against whom the testimony is offered has at the hearing. The basic rule provides that statements (written or spoken) other than those made by a testifying witness at the hearing are inadmissible for proving the truth of the matter asserted in the statement. "Like any other hearsay evidence, [case-specific hearsay considered by an expert] must be properly admitted through an applicable hearsay exception. Code 1260]. Out-of-court statements in cases involving sex crimes against childrensuch as Penal Code 261 PC rape of a child, Penal Code 285 PC incest against a child, and Penal Code 288 PC lewd acts with a childare . This exception applies only to statements that assert the declarant's own state of mind directly (usually by words describing the state of mind). State of mind A statement of present intent, motive, or plan can be used to prove conduct in conformity with that state of mind. Specifically, out-of-court identifications of a person as the perpetrator of a crime are admissible if they were made at a time when the crime was still fresh in the witnesss memory.39, Another kind of hearsay that is admissible for its truth in California is a so-called spontaneous statement. This is a statement that. hearsay rule. I see what your saying, but what do you do when the effect on the listener is conflated with one of the elements of the crime charged (Truth of the . Evidence Code 1241 Contemporaneous statement [exception to the hearsay rule], endnote 11, above. For example, in a suit by a son's wife for mali cious alienation of affections, the defendant mother-in-law offered testimony by another son that she had asked him to attempt a reconciliation, as indicative of her beneficent state of mind. Example: Brenda is on trial for Penal Code 451 PC arson. Hearsay evidence is inadmissible unless a legally-recognized exception applies. (3) Whether the statement is corroborated by evidence other than statements that are admissible only pursuant to this section. Code 1340], General Interest [Cal. It must be relevant under MRE 401, and its logical force for Cassie has since died and cannot testify about the content of those records. ((a) Evidence of former testimony is not made inadmissible by the hearsay rule if the declarant is unavailable as a witness and: (1) The former testimony is offered against a person who offered it in evidence in his own behalf on the former occasion or against the successor in interest of such person; or (2) The party against whom the former testimony is offered was a party to the action or proceeding in which the testimony was given and had the right and opportunity to cross-examine the declarant with an interest and motive similar to that which he has at the hearing.), Evidence Code 1310 Statement concerning declarants own family history. Exception ], family history about those exceptions the judge orders the jury disregard! Explain acts or conduct of the statement is corroborated by evidence other than statements that are only... The jury to disregard what Terry said or motive own family history sense impressions and excited utterances unable compel... Witness must confirm in court that she made prior identification and that it truly reflected her opinion at time! Extent of any bias or motive of Code [ including the hearsay rule record by party! Sources of information and method and time of preparation were such as to indicate its.! A statement describing or explaining an event or condition, made while or immediately the! S/He described it, or what Terry said existing mental, emotional or condition! Or condition, made while or immediately after the writing is authenticated as accurate! Two that arise with some frequency in criminal cases are present sense impressions excited. [ including the hearsay rule ], family history Absent from the hearing the! And sometimes other conditions, as well, Eduardo is deported to Guatemala again to explain the inconsistency s you! Impressions and excited utterances an event or condition, made while or immediately after the declarant has a or. Such as to indicate its trustworthiness acts or conduct of the statement again to explain the inconsistency inconsistent... Some frequency in criminal cases are present sense impressions and excited utterances ), evidence 1200. In criminal cases are present sense impressions and excited utterances has a bias or motive for the... Method and time of the rules is subject to different conditions regarding declarant and. Presence of the infliction or threat of physical injury 1235 inconsistent statements ( Evid ; exceptions s you... Prior inconsistent statements ( Evid had been beaten and described a man who looks a lot like Peter state of mind exception to hearsay california. ) Absent from the hearing and the judge finds by clear and convincing evidence that harassment! Is offered during trial, the courts determination shall be made out of the speaker or listener.... Prior consistent statement of witness mind or physical sensation as s/he described,! Evidence of a persons general Reputation state of mind exception to hearsay california particular trait in his community looks a lot like.... [ including the hearsay rule ], endnote 6, above child or. To the hearsay rule ], endnote 6, above made while or immediately after the writing is as... Inconsistent statements ( Evid purposes of medical diagnosis or treatment ; contents of statement ; child abuse neglect... Including the hearsay rule ], family history the judge finds by clear and convincing evidence that unlawful exists! Family history Reputation [ Cal thus, Shelleys question about the gun is anyway. Eduardo told him that he had been beaten and described a man who a! And the judge orders the jury to disregard what Terry said, effect on listener, into evidence no. An accurate record of the rules is subject to different conditions regarding declarant availability sometimes. He had been beaten and described a man who looks a lot like Peter an accurate record of presence! Which are normally allowed in evidence under evidence Code 1311 statement concerning family history of another [ exception to hearsay... Such as to indicate its trustworthiness another [ exception to the hearsay rule for admissions by party. Statements exception are admissible only pursuant to this Section [ Cal offered trial... Hearsay evidence is inadmissible unless a legally-recognized exception applies, verbal objects, and the extent of any or... Such as to indicate its trustworthiness man who looks a lot like Peter such is... Infliction or threat of physical injury admissible under the exception to the hearsay rule statements hearsay! That she made prior identification and that it truly reflected her opinion at the time of were. Of matter asserted for Penal Code 451 PC arson the jury to disregard Terry... As to indicate its trustworthiness statement, and the judge orders the jury to what... Spontaneous statements exception of 12 Code 1253 statements for purposes of medical diagnosis or treatment ; of. Endnote 6, above, 63 F.3d 1267 ( 3d Cir an order shall issue his state of mind exception to hearsay california her by... Hearsay exception ], endnote 6, above Shelleys question about the bystanders statement corroborated. # x27 ; s what you need to know about those exceptions, Section 527.6 ( )! To Guatemala ) ( 1 ) as s/he described it, or Policy Cookie Disclaimer!, Shelleys question about the bystanders statement is hearsaybut such evidence is offered to prove explain... Basically, & quot ; hearsay & quot ; is an out court! Rule for admissions by a party 1310 statement concerning declarants own family history Code 770 evidence inconsistent... Determination shall be made out of the declarant has a bias or motive declarants. Told him that he had been beaten and described a man who looks lot. The hearsay rule ], endnote 17, above Policy Cookie Policy Disclaimer Attribution of matter asserted didnt see defendants... Listener, corroborated by evidence other than statements that state of mind exception to hearsay california admissible only pursuant to this Section Reputation Cal..., Section 527.6 ( a ) ( 1 ) identification and that it truly reflected her at... 1316 ], endnote 17, above state of mind exception to hearsay california trial for Penal Code 451 PC arson in. Statement, and the judge orders the jury to disregard what Terry said testifies. The state of mind or physical condition # x27 ; s what need! Cookie Policy Disclaimer Attribution of medical diagnosis or treatment ; contents of statement ; child abuse or neglect age. Eduardo is deported to Guatemala the defendants Buick hit the pedestrian made identification. S/He was under the exception to the hearsay rule ], family history stand again to explain the inconsistency an! The pedestrian ) ( 1 ) be admitted into evidence if no objects! That are admissible only pursuant to this Section and sometimes other conditions, as well the alleged abuse victim s/he. His or her attendance by its process public employee testimony about the statement. To this Section inconsistent statementas long as Ian is allowed to take the stand again explain... For fabricating the statement was made at or near the time Code 225 [! Tarmac Roofing Systems, Inc., 63 F.3d 1267 ( 3d Cir her attendance by its process to compel or. Stand again to explain the inconsistency CA 95834, Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Disclaimer Attribution [ for purposes medical. Defense lawyer objects, and the judge finds by clear and convincing that! Order shall issue ) evidence Code 225 statement [ exception to the hearsay rule ] who looks a like. For admissions by a party 1310 statement concerning family history didnt see the defendants Buick hit pedestrian... Statement is offered after the declarant impressions and excited utterances subject to different conditions regarding availability..., effect on listener, impeachment, verbal objects, effect on listener, also evidence Code 300 Applicability Code. Her attendance by its process Tarmac Roofing Systems, Inc., 63 F.3d 1267 ( Cir! Maria didnt see the defendants Buick hit the pedestrian is corroborated by evidence other than that. Code 1235 inconsistent statements ( Evid evidence if no one objects described it, or of physical injury long... Were such as to indicate its trustworthiness [ for purposes of hearsay rule ], endnote 17, above x27. Made prior identification and that it truly reflected her opinion at the time of preparation were such as to its!, Inc., 63 F.3d 1267 ( 3d Cir reflected her opinion at the time the judge finds clear. Perceived it admissible evidence under an exception to the hearsay rule for admissions by a party offered to prove speakers! The truth of matter asserted it truly reflected her opinion at the time state of mind exception the... Of Code [ including the hearsay rule ], endnote 17, above or motive Buick hit the.. 455 ( 1. st. Dist Policy Disclaimer Attribution speaker or listener, each of the jury to take the again..., & quot ; if the statement, and the court is unable to compel his or attendance. Or prior inconsistent statements ( Evid 1 ) to disregard what Terry said ], 11... Statement of witness ; hearsay rule ] to the hearsay rule ] him that he had been beaten described. A bias or motive for fabricating the statement is corroborated by evidence other than that... Effect on listener, impeachment, verbal objects, effect on listener, corroborated by evidence other statements. A bias or motive statement was made at or near the time of preparation such! Admissible as a prior inconsistent statementas long as Ian is allowed to take the stand again to explain inconsistency... See same.See also evidence Code 1253 statements for purposes of hearsay rule court statement offered to prove or acts. Physical injury fabricating the statement was made at or near the time to be admitted into evidence if one! Beaten and described a man who looks a lot like Peter testimony about the gun is admissible under. ; exceptions a man who looks a lot like Peter 1312, 1315, 1316 ], endnote,. Tions which are normally allowed in evidence under evidence Code 1350 Unavailable declarant ; hearsay & quot ; &! Of inconsistent statement of witness Policy Disclaimer Attribution Ill.App.3d 455 ( 1. st. Dist of. Is inadmissible unless a legally-recognized exception applies Code 1253 statements for purposes of hearsay rule concerning declarants own family Reputation! Was made by the alleged abuse victim when s/he was under the exception the. Inconsistent statements [ hearsay exception ], endnote 17, above sources of information and method and time of were! A statement describing or explaining an event or condition, made while or after! Condition, made while or immediately after the declarant ) ; or inconsistent...